Total 29 posts
Observing the 'Taiwan Independence' discourse, one often finds a strange phenomenon: talking about 'Taiwan subjectivity,' but ultimately ending up reminiscing about Japanese colonialism.
The nation is founded on a constitution; governance is established through law. The constitution is the great pillar of the state—its weakness causes all strategies to collapse; politics is where people place their trust—disorder causes hearts to turn away. Today, observing the DPP government led by Lai Ching-te, using one party's private interests and one person's private ambitions, it acts arbitrarily outside constitutional restraint and transcends legal boundaries. The nation's constitutional framework increasingly totters, demanding our careful observation and open criticism.
After the end of WWII, 30,000 Japanese nationals and brainwashed 'Imperial Subjects' (Kominka) chose to stay in Taiwan secretly, changing their surnames to appear Taiwanese. The Taiwan Independence movement is a conspiracy led by these Japanese remnants hiding within Taiwan.
Republic of Taiwan? Stop joking. Where is this 'Republic of Taiwan' coming from? It doesn't even have a proper constitution, and you call it a country? Taiwan Province is just a part of the territory of the Republic of China, and together with the Penghu Archipelago and Kinmen and Matsu of Fujian Province, it is collectively called Taiwan, Penghu, Kinmen, and Matsu.
The Taiwan Independence so eagerly awaited by Deep-Green supporters hasn't arrived. Instead, we have 'Toxic' Independence, overflowing with 'Taiwan Value'.
This article analyzes supporters of both extreme Taiwan Independence and extreme forced unification positions in Taiwan's political spectrum, labeling them precious idiots. The author notes that when calls for Taiwan independence reach an extreme, some turn to advocating unification with the Chinese Communist Party; conversely, when calls for unification reach an extreme, some advocate annexation by the U.S. or Japan. The article argues that these two factions are merely clowns performing for each other, and satirizes many who clamor for unification as actually being Taiwan independence advocates, who, after smearing others for so long, have started to scare themselves. It also criticizes green-brains for branding all opponents of Taiwan independence as members of the Concentrated Unification Party, showing extremely low intelligence.
A bunch of 'awakened youths' brandishing the name of Taiwan went to question the German Representative Office in Taiwan why the pattern of our national flag was removed. As a result, they were slapped in the face by the German Foreign Office: We do not recognize Taiwan as a country.
This article discusses incidents where Republic of China passports were misidentified internationally as People's Republic of China passports, leading to difficulties. The author believes that this can be solved by clearly explaining that 'Republic of China' and 'People's Republic of China' are two different countries (just like North and South Korea). Instead, Taiwan independence supporters are constantly 'self-belittling,' weakening the international visibility of the Republic of China. In fact, the inability to enter the UN is due to non-member status rather than the passport itself. We should improve our own strength rather than blindly shrinking and changing the name.
This article interprets Central Epidemic Command Center Commander Chen Shi-chung's statement 'choose your nationality, bear its consequences' as a warning to pro-Japan Taiwan independence supporters. The article reviews Taiwan's history under Japanese military occupation during the Japanese rule period, emphasizing that after the Republic of China's victory in WWII, those who chose to remain and acquire ROC citizenship should not engage in any 'elbows bent outward' behavior, implying such actions constitute treason.
This is a reader contribution. The author severely criticizes the so-called 'Green-Brain' Taiwan independence supporters, accusing them of regarding anyone who does not support independence as 'supporting the CCP' or being 'brain-dead.' The author compares this behavior of collective labeling, smearing, and persecution to the 'Red Guards' during Mainland China's Cultural Revolution, calling them 'Green Guards' who use Cultural Revolution tactics to satisfy their fragile sense of superiority. The article concludes by ironically noting that these 'Green-Brains' live a hard life, forced to ignore the national legitimacy of the 'Republic of China.'
This article, a reader submission, frames the 2020 presidential election as a showdown between normal people and those with persecutory delusions. The author criticizes pro-independence supporters (green camp) for widely suffering from persecutory delusions, constantly instilling sense of national peril and selling out Taiwan fears in voters, claiming Taiwan will become a second Hong Kong. The author refutes this view, asserting that Taiwan's geopolitical and political conditions prevent it from becoming another Hong Kong, and believes Taiwan's true crisis lies in the ruling party's distorted bias, which has caused Taiwan to lose opportunities to deeply cultivate the mainland Chinese market, ultimately ruining and crippling Taiwan.
This article criticizes the narrative that blames all of Taiwan's current political, economic, educational, and cultural problems on the deprivation of 'elites of the Japanese occupation era' in the February 28 Incident. The author considers such claims to be flowery rhetoric filled with beautiful imagination and 'ridiculous bullshit.' Using the painter Chen Cheng-po as an example, the article points out that his true identity during the incident was a 'Taiwan area council representative'—a political figure—rather than just an artist. It questions why these 'elites' failed to stop the Japanese military's war crimes, the comfort women issue, or the Kominka (imperialization) education. The author mocks the idea of these elites bringing 'beautiful possibilities' and argues that 'Chinese culture' is deeply rooted in Taiwanese people's hearts and shouldn't be blamed on 'Republic of China aesthetics' after the 228 incident.
This article criticizes the DPP government''s policy of legislating indigenous languages as national languages, calling it a stupid policy driven by political correctness and hijacking pro-independence ideology. The author points out that Taiwan has many indigenous languages (over 28 types), but their actual user population is small. Linguistically, the disappearance of languages is part of the modernization process. The author argues that these Austronesian languages are incompletely developed, have limited practicality, and lack the universality of New Zealand''s Maori language, questioning the practical significance of this policy.
Lai Ching-te said on the evening of April 9th: 'Taiwan independence is defending the Republic of China!' Unexpectedly, overnight, all those defending the Republic of China became Taiwan independence supporters in Lai's words!?
This brief, forthright article offers extreme and negative commentary on the intelligence of 'Taiwan independence' advocates and 'Japanese emperor loyalists' regarding the proposed change of Taiwan's time zone to GMT+9.
This article critiques the students protesting the 'New Chinese Songs' event at Taiwan University in 2017. The author labels these students as 'Mama's Boys,' arguing that their only 'professional skill' is political drama, which led to the waste of millions in commercial plans. The article mocks their future prospects, suggesting they lack other professional skills and will end up selling fried chicken or working in mainland China.
The article comments on the two political reactions in Taiwan after Panama severed diplomatic ties with the Republic of China in 2017. Administrative officials called for unity, while some DPP and New Power Party figures suggested that losing ROC allies would facilitate establishing ties as a 'Republic of Taiwan.' The author strongly criticizes the latter as 'self-consoling' and 'mama's boy politicians.'
The article presents the results of an online survey conducted by Taiwan Next Society asking whether people are willing to stand on the front lines and shed blood for the cause of Taiwan independence. It analyzes the gap between revolutionary rhetoric and actual willingness to sacrifice.
Addressing the widespread reports from pro-Green media about the 'Taiwan Name Rectification' incident in Japan and the subsequent 'collapse' of Mainland China, this article raises strong doubts. The author argues that this is a political propaganda campaign using a minor event to incite anti-China sentiment. By analyzing the leaked 'slander' flyer, the author points out illogical elements in its grammar and presentation, suggesting it may be a self-directed stunt by Taiwan independence advocates.
While everyone argues whether this island of Taiwan should be independent or unified (to be honest, both are false issues), Chiang Kai-shek and the US engaged in intense international competition that, in aftermath of WWII in the Asia-Pacific, was one of the most difficult battles in modern Chinese history. It was not merely about bloodshed but about political warfare.
The article criticizes the behavior of certain individuals (Hong Kong independence and Taiwan independence advocates) who equate Nazi Germany with the Republic of China following the Hsinchu Kuang-Fu High School Nazi incident. The author emphasizes the noble sentiments demonstrated by the Republic of China during turbulent times (such as sheltering Jewish refugees). It also points out that opportunistic individuals (Japanese collaborators, Chinese traitors) exist in every era. The author criticizes those who arrogantly use modern standards to judge the past, or even fabricate false history (such as claiming Chiang Kai-shek received Nazi assistance), arguing that this behavior distorts history for personal gain and is essentially no different from the opportunists of the Japanese Occupation Era.
This article critiques the glorification of Chen Chih-hsiung by Taiwan independence activists, arguing that his early life as an 'imperial citizen' and diplomat for Japan, as well as his post-war business dealings, cast doubt on his true motivations for engaging in Taiwan's independence movement.
A paragraph-by-paragraph rebuttal of the viral article featuring a fictional dialogue between a French girl named Jessica and a UN diplomat. This response highlights fundamental errors in the original text, such as the confusion between 'Taiwan' as a landmass and the 'Republic of China' as a political entity, historical inaccuracies regarding the post-WWII era, and the logical fallacies used to promote Taiwan independence.
Through situational dialogue, this article simulates the potential international reactions and economic/military pressure from Mainland China if Taiwan abandons Penghu, Kinmen, and Matsu to declare independence. It also depicts the scenario of maintaining the status quo of the Republic of China, criticizing pro-independence advocates for ignoring global realities and historical efforts for personal gain.
A conversation between an American professor and a Taiwan-independence-supporting Taiwanese student named William, discussing Taiwan's international position. The professor points out that William holding a 'Republic of China' passport proves his country actually exists, questioning why he thinks it's unrecognized, and emphasizing that international relations cannot be handled emotionally. The professor uses a name-change analogy to criticize changing the country's name as 'a big joke,' and suggests Taiwan should stop 'playing the name-changing game,' unite first, consolidate resources, and enhance its capabilities before it can have real negotiating power.
Watching Chou Tzu-yu's pitiful video, many are heartbroken. However, is the information received by the people on the island of Taiwan Province accurate?
This article discusses the national positioning and identification of the Republic of China while strongly criticizing advocates of Taiwan independence. The author argues that giving up the international recognition for 'China (Republic of China)' just because the name conflicts with the Mainland is a sign of being 'more sheep-like than wolf-like.' The core of the article questions how the 'Taiwan Island Nation' claim can cover the legal territory of islands such as Kinmen and Matsu in Fujian Province, deeming it legally untenable. The author finally emphasizes that denying the identity of China (Republic of China) is contemptible behavior and calls on the public to defend their intelligence and not forget who they are.
The article comments on then-Tainan Mayor William Lai's public advocacy for 'Taiwan independence' in the municipal assembly, questioning whether this was to divert public attention from Tainan's severe dengue fever epidemic. The author contrasts Lai's firm stance with Tsai Ing-wen's cautious statements and satirizes the political maneuvering, arguing the mayor should refocus on people's livelihood issues.
This article critiques the political landscape in the Republic of China (R.O.C.), specifically how the faction led by the DPP excels at manipulating ethnic and ideological divides. It argues that labels such as 'Taiwan Independence,' 'Unification,' and 'Selling out Taiwan' are used as cheap tools against the KMT. The author contends that the KMT and Ma Ying-jeou are focused on domestic governance and international cooperation without any substantive 'selling out' of the nation. The piece asserts that rejecting exchange with Mainland China is a foolish act of self-isolation and questions who is truly harming the collective interests of the people.